Wole Soyinka’s Art of
Characterization in the play “The Swamp Dweller”
· Introduction:
The full name of Soyinka is Akinwande
Oluwole “Wole” Soyinka. He is a Nigerian playwright and poet. He won the Nobel
Prize in literature in 1986, the first African to be honoured.
Soyinka was born on 13th
July, 1934 into a Yoruba family in Abeokuta. He took an active role in
Nigeria’s political history and its struggle for independence from Great
Britain.
He has strongly criticised many Nigerian
military dictators and other political tyrannous. Much of his writings has been
concerned with,
“...the oppressive boot and the irrelevance of
the colour that wears it.”
Living
in the United States, he was a professor first at Cornell University and then
at Emory University in Atlanta. He has also taught at the universities of
Oxford, Harvard and Yale. He has got fame as poet and essayist also.
“The
Swamp Dweller”, “The Lion and the Jewel”, “Madman and Specialists”, “A Dance of
the Forest” are some of his famous plays. “Idanre and other poems”, “A Shuttle
in the Crypt”, “Mandela’s Earth and Other Poems” are some of his poetry
collections. “Towards a True Theatre”, “Culture in Transition”, “The Blackman
and the Veil” are some of his well known essays. He has written novels, short
stories, memoirs and translations also. He has a great sight to see and feel
the thing minutely.
“Even when I am writing plays I enjoy having
company and mentally I think of that company as the company I am writing for.”
-Wole
Soyinka
· About the Play:
“The
Swamp Dweller” is comparatively short of all of Soyinka’s plays. It deals with
a story of poor family living in Niger Delta region. In this play Soyinka uses
new technique that is getting information from every new character in the play.
The poor family is reflection of all who struggle for survival. The narrative
technique is not in action format, but a descriptive one.
Every
new character narrates his experiences with the other characters of the play.
While doing this Soyinka never allows himself to detrack from the original
story. He successfully manages to bring these experiences into a full-fledged
story with a good beginning, middle and end.
The
play is not divided in acts and scenes. By doing this he avoids any sort of
interruption in the smooth going story. In this play we don’t find even a
single irrelevant scene or event.
· Soyinka’s Art of Characterization:
The
characters of the play can be put into three groups:
Ø The
parents Makuri and Alu- Conservative
Ø The
priest Kadiye- Hippocratic
Ø Igwezu
and Beggar- Two positive individuals.
The parents are conservative who wants
to bind their children by their love and avoid their ambition to fly high. The
priest Kadiye is a corrupt who beguiles his superstitious followers and remains
always in beneficial situation immorally. Igwezu and the Beggar are moving,
wandering, seeking and then also what they found is uncertain. This is the play
of mood and atmosphere. This play gives audience a chance to involve into it
deeply. It gives an opportunity to make comparisons and judgement. Soyinka’s
art remains in contrast and comparison between characters. There is contrast
between two brothers, father and son, between mother in law and daughter in
law. And the main contrast is between the beggar and the priest Kadiye. We can
see the comparison also between Igwezu and the beggar.
· Two brothers:
Awuchike
and Igwezu are twin brothers who look alike but there is a vast difference
between the both. Awuchike has left home for ten years and lives in town. There
he deals in timbers and thrives fast. But he never cares for his poor parents.
He has cut all the communication with his parents and he has involved himself
in earning money in town. He became blind towards his family and
responsibility. Whereas Igwezu is quite opposite to him. He also goes to town
to seek his fortune with his wife. But he is aware about his responsibility.
Igwezu
promised that, with first earned money, he will send a swivel chair for his
father and he fulfils his promise. He takes care of his parents and
communicates with them.
Awuchike
is callous, feelingless, self-centred, disobedient, egoistic and immoral person
while Igwezu is obedient, dutiful and careful towards his parents.
·
Contrast between mother in law and daughter in law:
There
are two women in the family. Both are contrast image of each other. As a wife
and as a woman both are different from each other.
As
a wife Alu (Igwezu’s mother) is faithful and loyal towards her husband. On the
contrary, Desala (Igwezu’s wife) is betrayer and unfaithful towards Igwezu. Alu
was very beautiful in her youth. Alu and Makuri lead their conjugal life in
subsistence level. They live from hand to mouth. Throughout her life she shares
the well and woe of her husband and remains faithful. Makuri never feels
tension for her sake. Moreover she loves the swamp region and never expresses
any wish to leave for city.
But
Igwezu’s wife Desala is opposite to her. She does not like poor, rustic life.
She is money minded and materialistic woman. Humanly feelings can’t touch her.
She leaves Igwezu and goes with well settled Awuchike. So, these are the
differences between the two women.
Well answered.
ReplyDelete